The flight was ENTO to ESSB with the Q400.
Transition altitudes on both sides 7000 ft.
The flightplan (in attached zip together with the logfiles) contains SID and STAR.
Strange, that when cleared to climb FL130, after changed to another centre controller, the reply is: 'Roger, altitude 994'. Also strange, but that goes for almost every situation in PF3 that the VCP adds 'IFR' to his callout while above transition altidue. By my knowledge traffic above TA is ALWAYS IFR so to add 'IFR' is useless. I was so lucky to have had many jumpseat rides in the real world and I NEVER heard anyone using that IFR in callouts. Back to the problem I had.
The STAR contains altitude constraints but I've read somewhere that I must not edit that part of the flightplan. Since after loading the flightplan I can see that PF3 did not use the constraints from the plan that was loaded. I was puzzled. TEB50 has below 9000, then TEB36 with above 5000, then followed by above 2500 and finally the FAF at 2200.
Since there was silence from ATC at my VNAV active point, I asked for 9000 and got it. Then I asked for 5000 and got it. So far in harmony with the VNAV profile. But... to get on the ground I had to go lower after that. SUddenly ATC nagged me to stay at 5000, followed by absolute silence. So I landed the Q400 without haering anything further from ATC.
Next time I'll tell ATC to shut up until I'm on short final, but that is far from realism.
I sure hope one day PF3 can handle SIDs and STARs in a more realistic manner (by f.i. Navigraph). That might also solve the problem of planning a flight, load it in PF3 and then find out that the wind has changed (and the active RWY as well) at the destination airport.
Dirk