OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Vector vs. STAR

PLEASE NOTE:

If you are reporting an issue with PF3 please remember to Zip and attach the Debug_Monitor.log file from your PF3\Logs folder. Thank you.

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 5 posts ]
Author Message
woyzeck42
Post subject: Vector vs. STAR
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 3:43 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:11 am
 
Hi,
:D
Just curious how many people choose to be factored into a landing versus using the star? I’m not sure which one is more “realistic.” I have always used STAR and tried vectoring and it was fun. Your thoughts appreciated.


Top
Profile Quote
Dan77
Post subject: Re: Vector vs. STAR
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 6:14 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 2:22 am
 
With the STAR box unchecked at the bottom of the SID/STAR page, you will get vectors after your last PF3 waypoint. With the STAR box checked, you will not get vectors. PF3 will tell you which runway is active and you will be cleared at pilot's discretion to fly there and line up on final, without any further instructions. The choice depends on preference but also on the approach and terrain. PF3 uses a standard vectoring algorithm that works well in areas without a lot of mountains or obstructions. If the airport is surrounded by mountains or has very difficult approaches, vectoring may not work well because the obstructions are not taken into account. In these cases you are better off flying a published approach procedure at pilot's discretion, because they are specifically designed to avoid irregular terrain and obstructions. Mexico City MMMX is an example of an airport where you would definitely not want PF3 to vector you on approach.

If you are sure you won't want vectors on approach you can check the STAR box before the flight, but if you are unsure, leave the box unchecked. Once PF3 starts vectoring you, you can hit hotkey 1 to request clearance at pilot's discretion if you prefer and PF3 will clear you to complete the approach on your own.

_________________

Dan


Top
Profile Quote
Dave March
Post subject: Re: Vector vs. STAR
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 6:17 pm
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 6197
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Sawtry, Cambridgeshire. UK
Contact: Website
 
I guess either way is realistic. In RL you may fly a complete STAR or you may well get vectors midway through... other times you will just be vectored. Back in the good old days of FS II you'd get neither and had to learn how to navigate... that was fun!

_________________

Cheers

Dave March

Email: dmarch@oncourse-software.co.uk

I don't know if my memory is getting worse as I get older...
...I just can't remember how it used to be!

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
woyzeck42
Post subject: Re: Vector vs. STAR
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:36 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:11 am
 
I’m showing my age but I remember when flight simulator 2.0 got released and I asked the sales person if I had enough RAM. I told him I had 4MB and he said “you will never need more than 4MB of RAM.” Lol. How things change.


Top
Profile Quote
Dave March
Post subject: Re: Vector vs. STAR
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:22 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 6197
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Sawtry, Cambridgeshire. UK
Contact: Website
 
Don't get me started! I wrote my first commercial program (payroll) with 32k memory!

_________________

Cheers

Dave March

Email: dmarch@oncourse-software.co.uk

I don't know if my memory is getting worse as I get older...
...I just can't remember how it used to be!

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 5 posts ]
Return to “PF3-ATC at its best”
Jump to: