OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Altitude approach problem...

PLEASE NOTE:

If you are reporting an issue with PF3 please remember to Zip and attach the Debug_Monitor.log file from your PF3\Logs folder. Thank you.

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ]
Author Message
drumsart
Post subject: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 4:15 am
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
Hi,

During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !

I was forced to descend to VS 2000ft to catch the glide ;)

Attached the logs.

Thank you and Regards,

Edit : I just found out that I had set previously there are some weeks (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft !
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.

Attachments
Logs.rar
(537.28 KiB) Downloaded 237 times

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:19 am
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
drumsart wrote: *  Thu May 18, 2017 4:15 am
Hi,

During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !

I was forced to descend to VS 2000ft to catch the glide ;)

Attached the logs.

Thank you and Regards,

Edit : I just found out that I had set previously there are some weeks (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft !
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.
Quote:
During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !
:shock: Your fpl cruise altitude was already 4,000ft!! you should have used the DENEN 2P approach which is also at 4,000ft and the FAF is 3,000ft. Also LBE has been renamed to LBV so you need to update that.
an alternative and more correct fpl would be RENSU LBV WSR GIBMA BMN
I strongly recommend that your cruise altitude be set higher say FL100 or FL120 Descend to be at 4,000ft by GIBMA.
Descend to be at BMN at 3,000ft. It is a hold. So in your wpt altitude page fix the altitude of BMN at 3,000ft and mark it as a hold. From there you fly either to ROGBO or BANIX to intercept the localiser depending on the rwy in use. Not forgetting to set your FAF to 3,000ft. So you actually fly to directly above the airport and then at a tangent to intercept the relevant localiser.

The fpl is similar to LSGG to LIPO in that there is a wypt directly over the airport. This can sometimes cause confusion. So you should have two alternative fpls that end in either ROGBO or BANIX. It's a short flight so the weather won't change much. Just make sure that the wind is not across the rwy as that confuses tha AI as well.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:54 am
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
[ attachment ]
ed.jpg (10.54 KiB) Viewed 4123 times

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 4:24 am
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
vololiberista wrote: *  Thu May 18, 2017 9:19 am
drumsart wrote: *  Thu May 18, 2017 4:15 am
Hi,

During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !

I was forced to descend to VS 2000ft to catch the glide ;)

Attached the logs.

Thank you and Regards,

Edit : I just found out that I had set previously there are some weeks (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft !
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.
Quote:
During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !
:shock: Your fpl cruise altitude was already 4,000ft!! you should have used the DENEN 2P approach which is also at 4,000ft and the FAF is 3,000ft. Also LBE has been renamed to LBV so you need to update that.
an alternative and more correct fpl would be RENSU LBV WSR GIBMA BMN
I strongly recommend that your cruise altitude be set higher say FL100 or FL120 Descend to be at 4,000ft by GIBMA.
Descend to be at BMN at 3,000ft. It is a hold. So in your wpt altitude page fix the altitude of BMN at 3,000ft and mark it as a hold. From there you fly either to ROGBO or BANIX to intercept the localiser depending on the rwy in use. Not forgetting to set your FAF to 3,000ft. So you actually fly to directly above the airport and then at a tangent to intercept the relevant localiser.

The fpl is similar to LSGG to LIPO in that there is a wypt directly over the airport. This can sometimes cause confusion. So you should have two alternative fpls that end in either ROGBO or BANIX. It's a short flight so the weather won't change much. Just make sure that the wind is not across the rwy as that confuses tha AI as well.
Thank you for your answer. I'm aware about you wrote, LBV is in the GTN750. For the rest my flight was without approach procedure, I wanted just a vector approach by PF3.

My question/confirmation related to my post edited was"Edit : I just found out that I had set a few weeks or months ago (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft!
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.
"

Anyway, I have my answer. Before I made the flight again, I corrected/canceled the minimum FAF alt at EDDW in the PF3 Sid/Star menu. This time the final approach altitude was 2000ft (I have the FAF altitude by default in the advanced options and INI File Tweaks menu put to 2000ft). So, it was a glitch of myself :D

Regards,

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 9:40 am
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
drumsart wrote: *  Fri May 19, 2017 4:24 am
vololiberista wrote: *  Thu May 18, 2017 9:19 am
drumsart wrote: *  Thu May 18, 2017 4:15 am
Hi,

During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !

I was forced to descend to VS 2000ft to catch the glide ;)

Attached the logs.

Thank you and Regards,

Edit : I just found out that I had set previously there are some weeks (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft !
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.
Quote:
During approach to EDDW the center let me to 4000ft until the localizer is intercepted (frankly above the glide) :shock: !
:shock: Your fpl cruise altitude was already 4,000ft!! you should have used the DENEN 2P approach which is also at 4,000ft and the FAF is 3,000ft. Also LBE has been renamed to LBV so you need to update that.
an alternative and more correct fpl would be RENSU LBV WSR GIBMA BMN
I strongly recommend that your cruise altitude be set higher say FL100 or FL120 Descend to be at 4,000ft by GIBMA.
Descend to be at BMN at 3,000ft. It is a hold. So in your wpt altitude page fix the altitude of BMN at 3,000ft and mark it as a hold. From there you fly either to ROGBO or BANIX to intercept the localiser depending on the rwy in use. Not forgetting to set your FAF to 3,000ft. So you actually fly to directly above the airport and then at a tangent to intercept the relevant localiser.

The fpl is similar to LSGG to LIPO in that there is a wypt directly over the airport. This can sometimes cause confusion. So you should have two alternative fpls that end in either ROGBO or BANIX. It's a short flight so the weather won't change much. Just make sure that the wind is not across the rwy as that confuses tha AI as well.
Thank you for your answer. I'm aware about you wrote, LBV is in the GTN750. For the rest my flight was without approach procedure, I wanted just a vector approach by PF3.

My question/confirmation related to my post edited was"Edit : I just found out that I had set a few weeks or months ago (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft!
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not.
"

Anyway, I have my answer. Before I made the flight again, I corrected/canceled the minimum FAF alt at EDDW in the PF3 Sid/Star menu. This time the final approach altitude was 2000ft (I have the FAF altitude by default in the advanced options and INI File Tweaks menu put to 2000ft). So, it was a glitch of myself :D

Regards,
Except that the MSA is 2,100ft and the FAF is 3,000ft. You do need to look at the charts! I would leave the default settings as they were and adjust the FAF and Transition altitude on the SID STAR page for EDDW.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 2:52 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
Except that my problem was related to the fact that the center had not ordered me to go down during the final approach and left me at 4000ft.

The reason it happened was not given by your answer . No disrespect, the answer was interesting but irrelevant to my question. That was the meaning of my previous answer. Btw I know I do need to look at the charts except when I decide to do just one quick flight for in this case tested the new Mce (very promising)...!

Thank you and Regards,

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 6:40 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
drumsart wrote: *  Fri May 19, 2017 2:52 pm
Except that my problem was related to the fact that the center had not ordered me to go down during the final approach and left me at 4000ft.

The reason it happened was not given by your answer . No disrespect, the answer was interesting but irrelevant to my question. That was the meaning of my previous answer. Btw I know I do need to look at the charts except when I decide to do just one quick flight for in this case tested the new Mce (very promising)...!

Thank you and Regards,
Actually my answer as it were is in my alternative fpl. Feed that into PF3 complete with the stated altitude restrictions and you should be ok. If you still don't get a descent isntruction then we can look at the logs.

It is more likely that you didn't get a descent instruction because of your original fpl and PF3 settings. Set-up the correct FAF and transition altitude for the airport on the SID STAR page first. Reset the default value on the tweaks page. Make sure that the lack of response is not down to a problem with MCE.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 9:53 am
Offline
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:29 pm
 
Quote:
My question/confirmation related to my post edited was"Edit : I just found out that I had set a few weeks or months ago (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft!
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not."
Yes, that most probably caused your initial problem.

If you want to set the FAF for each airport depends on how accurate or realistic you want it to be.
For me the default general setting is good enough in most cases.

I even use the SimRandomizer to have a slightly different default FAF altitude and FAF distance every flight.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: Altitude approach problem...
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 4:39 am
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
RALF9636 wrote: *  Sat May 20, 2017 9:53 am
Quote:
My question/confirmation related to my post edited was"Edit : I just found out that I had set a few weeks or months ago (forgot that) the minimum FAF alt at EDDW to 19000ft!
So, maybe it's the problem. Thank you to confirm that or not."
Yes, that most probably caused your initial problem.

If you want to set the FAF for each airport depends on how accurate or realistic you want it to be.
For me the default general setting is good enough in most cases.

I even use the SimRandomizer to have a slightly different default FAF altitude and FAF distance every flight.
Thank you for your answer Ralf.
Yes, that most probably caused your initial problem.
Yes like I tried (hardly :roll: ;) ) to explain in my previous post, it was my initial problem.

If you want to set the FAF for each airport depends on how accurate or realistic you want it to be.
This is exactly how I conceive it.

For me the default general setting is good enough in most cases.
For me also...Excepted in some specific regions/airports (mountainous for example). In this case I use SID / Stars, appropriate FAF and so on...

I even use the SimRandomizer to have a slightly different default FAF altitude and FAF distance every flight.
At first I prefer to use PF3 only with Mce and wait until everything is fixed on the side of Mce. In this regard, congratulations for your report very detailed on the few "glitch" that remain to be settled in Mce.
Btw PF3 + Mce = great addon. 8-)

Regards,

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ]
Return to “PF3-ATC at its best”
Jump to: