OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with Mce.

PLEASE NOTE:

If you are reporting an issue with PF3 please remember to Zip and attach the Debug_Monitor.log file from your PF3\Logs folder. Thank you.

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]
Author Message
drumsart
Post subject: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with Mce.
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:38 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
Hi Thomas,

Via Mce I requested a FL070 (the original flight plan FL) because for a reason I don't know the control sent me to FL090. So, after requesting FL070 with the correct sequence "Control <indicatif>Request FL070" the Atc answered me to climb FL130 !?. I tried some others request and every time the result of the answer was never what I asked.
I open a topic in the Mce forum to know what are the keys sequence Mce sends to Pf3 (may be it's a Mce problem or a problem from me :roll: ).
Anyway I would like to know what is happened. Joined the Logs file.

Thanks and Regards,

Richard Portier

Attachments
Logs.zip
(1015.5 KiB) Downloaded 199 times

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:55 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
drumsart wrote:
Via Mce I requested a FL070 (the original flight plan FL) because for a reason I don't know the control sent me to FL090. So, after requesting FL070 with the correct sequence "Control <indicatif>Request FL070" the Atc answered me to climb FL130 !?. I tried some others request and every time the result of the answer was never what I asked.
OK, here some log lines that may help you with debugging MCE:
05/10/2016 01:09:22: 691 - Transcript: '  November 8665 Romeo resume own navigation  '
05/10/2016 01:09:38: 503 - ****** HotKey #10 detected!
05/10/2016 01:13:53: 949 - ****** HotKey #6 detected!
05/10/2016 01:13:55: 188 - Transcript: '  November 8665 Romeo Climb to Flight Level 90  '
HotKey #6 with Departure/Center/Approach is "Request higher altitude due to turbulence" and always gives you +2000 feet. This explains FL90, even if it is funny/inconsistent that PF3 uses the cleared altitude as reference here: Your aircraft was at 3017 feet at this point.
05/10/2016 01:19:38: 185 - ****** HotKey #19 detected!
05/10/2016 01:19:38: 255 - Requesting altitude change of +7000' at current alt of 5337
05/10/2016 01:19:39: 307 - Transcript: 'Roger   November 8665 Romeo Climb to Flight Level 120  '
05/10/2016 01:20:05: 304 - ****** HotKey #19 detected!
05/10/2016 01:20:05: 371 - Requesting altitude change of +7000' at current alt of 5698
05/10/2016 01:20:06: 432 - Transcript: 'Roger   November 8665 Romeo Climb and maintain Flight Level 130  '
HotKey #19 is "Request a Higher Altitude" (default key "H") and was pressed together with "7" for +7000 feet. One time at (rounded) 5000 feet and the second time at (rounded) 6000 feet, so the result is correct from PF3's view. It seems like MCE did not yet read the aircraft altitude to make the decision about which key to send.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:42 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
ThomasAH wrote:
drumsart wrote:
Via Mce I requested a FL070 (the original flight plan FL) because for a reason I don't know the control sent me to FL090. So, after requesting FL070 with the correct sequence "Control <indicatif>Request FL070" the Atc answered me to climb FL130 !?. I tried some others request and every time the result of the answer was never what I asked.
OK, here some log lines that may help you with debugging MCE:
05/10/2016 01:09:22: 691 - Transcript: '  November 8665 Romeo resume own navigation  '
05/10/2016 01:09:38: 503 - ****** HotKey #10 detected!
05/10/2016 01:13:53: 949 - ****** HotKey #6 detected!
05/10/2016 01:13:55: 188 - Transcript: '  November 8665 Romeo Climb to Flight Level 90  '
HotKey #6 with Departure/Center/Approach is "Request higher altitude due to turbulence" and always gives you +2000 feet. This explains FL90, even if it is funny/inconsistent that PF3 uses the cleared altitude as reference here: Your aircraft was at 3017 feet at this point.
05/10/2016 01:19:38: 185 - ****** HotKey #19 detected!
05/10/2016 01:19:38: 255 - Requesting altitude change of +7000' at current alt of 5337
05/10/2016 01:19:39: 307 - Transcript: 'Roger   November 8665 Romeo Climb to Flight Level 120  '
05/10/2016 01:20:05: 304 - ****** HotKey #19 detected!
05/10/2016 01:20:05: 371 - Requesting altitude change of +7000' at current alt of 5698
05/10/2016 01:20:06: 432 - Transcript: 'Roger   November 8665 Romeo Climb and maintain Flight Level 130  '
HotKey #19 is "Request a Higher Altitude" (default key "H") and was pressed together with "7" for +7000 feet. One time at (rounded) 5000 feet and the second time at (rounded) 6000 feet, so the result is correct from PF3's view. It seems like MCE did not yet read the aircraft altitude to make the decision about which key to send.
Thank you Thomas with these precious informations, this allows me to apprehend what instructions I have to ask to Mce. Even if the way is not very logical ... Maybe Mce can remedy this or better Pf3. The ideal would be to ask any flight level directly. In my case I should have asked for Altitude 2000 to go to FL 070 ? It's correct ?

On an other side I don't remember me to have requested a "Request higher altitude due to turbulence" !? May be a Mce glitch ? Curious...

An other thing I noticed...Control Atc contacts me in first every time ! I though that was corrected with the new version ? (I can open a new topic for that or you forward ?)

Regards,

Richard Portier

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:36 am
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
drumsart wrote:
Maybe Mce can remedy this or better Pf3. The ideal would be to ask any flight level directly.
I haven't thought too much about this, but relative to the cleared altitude would probably already be an improvement without disturbing the usage of long-time PF3/PFE users or the current implementation of MCE.
Or maybe one digit could mean +/- n*1000, and two or three digits FL nn/nnn or nn00/nnn00 feet.
drumsart wrote:
In my case I should have asked for Altitude 2000 to go to FL 070 ? It's correct ?
MCE should have translated FL70 to +2000 (press H, press 2, release 2, relase H) for you by looking at the current altitude. I thought it can do things like that.
I'll add a wishlist entry with these details.
drumsart wrote:
On an other side I don't remember me to have requested a "Request higher altitude due to turbulence" !? May be a Mce glitch ? Curious...
Yes, I think that was an MCE glitch.
drumsart wrote:
An other thing I noticed...Control Atc contacts me in first every time ! I though that was corrected with the new version ? (I can open a new topic for that or you forward ?)
A new topic might attract new attention from people who are interested in this topic, but not in MCE. And it would make it easier to refer to that discussion later, e.g. in the beta forum, when I don't have to say "hey, the details are there in that thread with a completely unrelated subject, just scroll down a bit and you might find it" :)
And I currently have only a vague idea what you are talking about.
... some digging later ...
Now I know what you are talking about: The initial contact by Departure "Roger November 8665 Romeo Radar contact QNH 1047" without pressing HotKey #0 first.
I just found it burried inside Constantly problems with flightplans, because I created a corresponding thread with only this topic in the beta forum :)
But sorry, this bug has not been fixed yet, but maybe you can try the possible workaround mentioned in above thread:
ThomasAH wrote:
You are using voice recognition, and I found in the logs that PF3 sometimes is very quick to move to the next call.
I suggest you set the "PTT pause interval" to somewhere between 5 to 10 seconds and/or use a PTT key to pause PF3 while you are talking.
You already have "PTT pause interval" at 8 seconds (good), so just the first half isn't enough.
But the PF3 log does not show any usage of the PTT key, so using "and" instead of "or" might help.
I assume you are already using a PTT key for MCE. Can you assign the same key as PTT key in PF3?
If you already did, maybe MCE "eats" the key before PF3 sees it, in this case you could use some key mapper (the one built into FSUIPC, or autohotkey) to pass one key (or button) press to two programs (MCE and FSX, PF3 will see the FSX key), or convince MCE to pass this key to FSX (maybe an option?).

Even if all this does not work, you can still do the check-in with Departure (and other Center facilities), even if they already contacted you, so PF3 does not get confused due to a missing check-in. Edit: I just saw that you did this.

But I'll add this information to the thread in the beta forum to raise the priority.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:13 am
Offline
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:29 pm
 
ThomasAH wrote:
Now I know what you are talking about: The initial contact by Departure "Roger November 8665 Romeo Radar contact QNH 1047" without pressing HotKey #0 first.
I just found it burried inside Constantly problems with flightplans, because I created a corresponding thread with only this topic in the beta forum :)
But sorry, this bug has not been fixed yet, but maybe you can try the possible workaround mentioned in above thread:
ThomasAH wrote:
You are using voice recognition, and I found in the logs that PF3 sometimes is very quick to move to the next call.
I suggest you set the "PTT pause interval" to somewhere between 5 to 10 seconds and/or use a PTT key to pause PF3 while you are talking.
You already have "PTT pause interval" at 8 seconds (good), so just the first half isn't enough.
But the PF3 log does not show any usage of the PTT key, so using "and" instead of "or" might help.
I assume you are already using a PTT key for MCE. Can you assign the same key as PTT key in PF3?
If you already did, maybe MCE "eats" the key before PF3 sees it, in this case you could use some key mapper (the one built into FSUIPC, or autohotkey) to pass one key (or button) press to two programs (MCE and FSX, PF3 will see the FSX key), or convince MCE to pass this key to FSX (maybe an option?).

Even if all this does not work, you can still do the check-in with Departure (and other Center facilities), even if they already contacted you, so PF3 does not get confused due to a missing check-in. Edit: I just saw that you did this.

But I'll add this information to the thread in the beta forum to raise the priority.
Just wanted to open a new topic on exactly the same issue. ;)

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
...
drumsart wrote:
In my case I should have asked for Altitude 2000 to go to FL 070 ? It's correct ?
MCE should have translated FL70 to +2000 (press H, press 2, release 2, relase H) for you by looking at the current altitude. I thought it can do things like that.
I'll add a wishlist entry with these details.

drumsart wrote:
An other thing I noticed...Control Atc contacts me in first every time ! I though that was corrected with the new version ? (I can open a new topic for that or you forward ?)
A new topic might attract new attention from people who are interested in this topic, but not in MCE. And it would make it easier to refer to that discussion later, e.g. in the beta forum, when I don't have to say "hey, the details are there in that thread with a completely unrelated subject, just scroll down a bit and you might find it" :)
And I currently have only a vague idea what you are talking about.
... some digging later ...
Now I know what you are talking about: The initial contact by Departure "Roger November 8665 Romeo Radar contact QNH 1047" without pressing HotKey #0 first.
I just found it burried inside Constantly problems with flightplans, because I created a corresponding thread with only this topic in the beta forum :)
But sorry, this bug has not been fixed yet, but maybe you can try the possible workaround mentioned in above thread:
ThomasAH wrote:
You are using voice recognition, and I found in the logs that PF3 sometimes is very quick to move to the next call.
I suggest you set the "PTT pause interval" to somewhere between 5 to 10 seconds and/or use a PTT key to pause PF3 while you are talking.
You already have "PTT pause interval" at 8 seconds (good), so just the first half isn't enough.
But the PF3 log does not show any usage of the PTT key, so using "and" instead of "or" might help.
I assume you are already using a PTT key for MCE. Can you assign the same key as PTT key in PF3?
If you already did, maybe MCE "eats" the key before PF3 sees it, in this case you could use some key mapper (the one built into FSUIPC, or autohotkey) to pass one key (or button) press to two programs (MCE and FSX, PF3 will see the FSX key), or convince MCE to pass this key to FSX (maybe an option?).

Even if all this does not work, you can still do the check-in with Departure (and other Center facilities), even if they already contacted you, so PF3 does not get confused due to a missing check-in. Edit: I just saw that you did this.

But I'll add this information to the thread in the beta forum to raise the priority.[/quote]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you Thomas for your clear explanations and great support !

1/MCE should have translated FL70 to +2000 (press H, press 2, release 2, relase H) for you by looking at the current altitude.
In my case to go to 070 from 090 it would be press L, press 2, release 2, release L, not H... Correct ?

2/Concerning the PTT, I saw after the flight that the option in Pf3 was unchecked (my fault). I will do another test with the option checked ;-). During this same flight I press the PTT directly on keyboard but not every time hence the result you may have read in the log. The PTT key (Del) is mapped via Fsuipc Joy Button 2 for Pf3 and Joy Button 2 directly in Mce. I must try if it's work with this config.

Regards,

Richard Portier

_________________

Richard Portier
MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core™ i7-4770K CPU Oc @ 4.5GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB|Windows10Pro64|P3Dv5|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Problem with lower/higher altitude during a flight with
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:16 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
drumsart wrote:
Thank you Thomas for your clear explanations and great support !
I know you’ll do the same for someone else :)
drumsart wrote:
1/MCE should have translated FL70 to +2000 (press H, press 2, release 2, relase H) for you by looking at the current altitude.
In my case to go to 070 from 090 it would be press L, press 2, release 2, release L, not H... Correct ?
No, you were at around 5000 feet and currently the reference is the current altitude, not the cleared altitude.
So to request FL70 while being at FL50, you need H2.
If you already had climbed to FL90, then L2 would be correct.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]
Return to “PF3-ATC at its best”
Jump to: