OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Runway change confusion

PLEASE NOTE:

If you are reporting an issue with PF3 please remember to Zip and attach the Debug_Monitor.log file from your PF3\Logs folder. Thank you.

Post Reply   Page 1 of 2  [ 15 posts ]
Jump to page 1 2 »
Author Message
helix1250
Post subject: Runway change confusion
Posted: Sun May 01, 2016 10:05 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:46 am
 
Evening everyone!

Could someone please check my logs? I had a flight this evening and all indications were that I was going to get a runway 15 at EGBB arrival given the winds at 180. Anyway got given a runway change and cleared for vectors to runway 33, but my vectors took me to runway 15 which would be correct for the winds.

I never recalled getting a second runway change after the initial clearance to runway 33. I checked back on the last ten messages and there was no mention of a second change. But if someone could have a peek I would appreciate it :)

Rob

Attachments
Logs.zip
(722.71 KiB) Downloaded 204 times


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 10:45 am
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
5/1/2016 21:00:28: 540 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Continue present heading expect vectors for the ILS runway 15  '
-> vectoring to rwy 15
5/1/2016 21:03:36: 160 - Runway 33 0 is being used by AI Traffic! #B
5/1/2016 21:03:36: 160 - Active Runway is set to 33
5/1/2016 21:03:42: 290 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Runway change expect vectors for the ILS runway 33 Approach  '
-> vectoring to rwy 33
5/1/2016 21:15:34: 830 - sWPRwyHdg = 328
5/1/2016 21:15:37: 200 - ****** HotKey #2 detected!
-> this is: Request an instrument approach (runway with ILS)
5/1/2016 21:15:40: 270 - Transcript: 'Stand by. We'll check  '
5/1/2016 21:15:45: 400 - Selecting runway (VFR/IFR=1)
5/1/2016 21:15:45: 400 - Active Runway is set to 15
5/1/2016 21:15:47: 700 - sWPRwyHdg = 148
-> vectoring to rwy 15
5/1/2016 21:28:25: 820 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Cleared for the ILS runway 15 Approach Contact Tower on 118.3 when established. descend on ILS  '
Wind was in favour of runway 15, but the AI decided to use runway 33 and so PF3 changed runway to 33.
Then you asked for an ILS runway (hotkey 2) and PF3 calculated from scratch based on wind -> runway 15.

At this point I would have expected PF3 to announce the runway change, but it did not.

I have checked old logs if I have a log using this feature and only found this one:
05/12/2015 15:10:11: 380 - Transcript: 'Cessna Juliet 1608 maintain Heading 255 Cleared to final for Sierra Tango Approach runway 7 at pilot's discretion Contact Tower on 129.8 when established.  '
05/12/2015 15:20:55: 800 - Transcript: 'Approach Cessna Juliet 1608 request an instrument approach  '
05/12/2015 15:21:01: 080 - Transcript: 'Stand by. We'll check  '
05/12/2015 15:21:16: 390 - Transcript: 'Cessna Juliet 1608 Continue present heading Cleared to final for Sierra Tango Approach runway 25 at pilot's discretion Contact Tower on 129.8 when established.  '
So all I can say is, that it worked:
- with beta version 2.999.14
- when using a STAR
- when not having a runway change before that.

Dave, can you verify the triggers for the ATC runway call?

Rob, I should add that you do not need to request the ILS approach, this is only meant to switch from a non-ILS runway to an ILS runway for airports having both. You still found a bug, but the workaround is to not ask for something you already have :)

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Dave March
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 11:23 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 6197
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Sawtry, Cambridgeshire. UK
Contact: Website
 
It's working exactly as designed as far as I can see. If PF3 has to use wind direction it will always periodically check to see if AI become active for any runway and if so will announce the change. Once you requested a particular runway, however, further changes will not occur.

_________________

Cheers

Dave March

Email: dmarch@oncourse-software.co.uk

I don't know if my memory is getting worse as I get older...
...I just can't remember how it used to be!

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
helix1250
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 11:27 am
Offline
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:46 am
 
Hi ThomasAH,

Thank you for checking the logs for me.

The reason I hit the "hotkey 2" was to see if I could get the Acars atis. As I already new the wind was better suited for a 15 arrival a I was looking at ASN window, and I wanted to see what weather PF3 was seeing to give the runway swap.

I didn't check the hotkey list for when coconnected to approach, hence me asking for a instrument approach that my mistake. But I guess by me doing that it forced PF3 to re-asses my approach, is that correct? What I find interesting if the AI was using 33, why was I seeing AI lining up waiting to take off from 15? All very odd indeed.

Regards Rob


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 11:52 am
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
dmarch wrote:
It's working exactly as designed as far as I can see. If PF3 has to use wind direction it will always periodically check to see if AI become active for any runway and if so will announce the change. Once you requested a particular runway, however, further changes will not occur.
That is not the problem.

The bug is that PF3 did not announce the runway change from 33 to 15 after pressing hotkey 2.
Hotkey 2 at approach does not request a particular runway, but says "hey, give me some runway with ILS". At this point Approach should tell me which runway to expect, so I'm able to find and tune to the correct ILS frequency earlier than when getting the clearance, i.e. either
"Jersey 559 Runway change expect vectors for the ILS runway 15 Approach"
or "Jersey 559 (maybe something with heading) expect vectors for the ILS runway 15"

helix1250 wrote:
I didn't check the hotkey list for when coconnected to approach, hence me asking for a instrument approach that my mistake. But I guess by me doing that it forced PF3 to re-asses my approach, is that correct?
Correct.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
helix1250
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 12:05 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:46 am
 
Thanks ThomasAH,

I understand what should have happened now, I should have been informed that I was going to be vectored to runway 15. But that that announcement didn't occure and instead it just sent me on the vectors to 15.

I wish there was a way to check why the AI would have been heading to 33, I had checked the winds via ASN at regular points on route and it was steady at 180 degrees. I'll contact AI software company I use to see if there is away it can be checked.

Cheers Rob


Top
Profile Quote
ThomasAH
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 12:10 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:27 pm
 
helix1250 wrote:
I wish there was a way to check why the AI would have been heading to 33, I had checked the winds via ASN at regular points on route and it was steady at 180 degrees. I'll contact AI software company I use to see if there is away it can be checked.
The log showed some changing winds. For a short time it was direction 255 at ground below your aircraft, and maybe the AI did not use the wind at the airport, but the wind near your aircraft.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
helix1250
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 12:25 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:46 am
 
Many thanks ThomasAH, that wind you found may well answer the runway swap.

Thank you for checking for me :)

Regards Rob


Top
Profile Quote
martinlest
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 6:17 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:33 pm
 
I have had a number of issues with runway changes lately - yesterday I was given six changes within as many minutes. A 'limiter' (one change is surely enough on any one flight) would be good.


Top
Profile Quote
Rustydog
Post subject: Re: Runway change confusion
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:05 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 5:52 pm
Location: Northamptonshire
 
martinlest wrote:
I have had a number of issues with runway changes lately - yesterday I was given six changes within as many minutes. A 'limiter' (one change is surely enough on any one flight) would be good.
I had that happen 3 flights in a row and thought something was broken but it hasn't happened since. It has happened on odd occasions before. I use ASN weather and suspect this has something to do with it. But a lock of some sort would be handy. Zigzagging makes passengers nervous. :lol:

_________________

Flying Daily, sometimes twice.

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 2  [ 15 posts ]
Return to “PF3-ATC at its best” | Jump to page 1 2 »
Jump to: