5/1/2016 21:00:28: 540 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Continue present heading expect vectors for the ILS runway 15 '
-> vectoring to rwy 15
5/1/2016 21:03:36: 160 - Runway 33 0 is being used by AI Traffic! #B
5/1/2016 21:03:36: 160 - Active Runway is set to 33
5/1/2016 21:03:42: 290 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Runway change expect vectors for the ILS runway 33 Approach '
-> vectoring to rwy 33
5/1/2016 21:15:34: 830 - sWPRwyHdg = 328
5/1/2016 21:15:37: 200 - ****** HotKey #2 detected!
-> this is: Request an instrument approach (runway with ILS)
5/1/2016 21:15:40: 270 - Transcript: 'Stand by. We'll check '
5/1/2016 21:15:45: 400 - Selecting runway (VFR/IFR=1)
5/1/2016 21:15:45: 400 - Active Runway is set to 15
5/1/2016 21:15:47: 700 - sWPRwyHdg = 148
-> vectoring to rwy 15
5/1/2016 21:28:25: 820 - Transcript: 'Jersey 559 Cleared for the ILS runway 15 Approach Contact Tower on 118.3 when established. descend on ILS ' |
Wind was in favour of runway 15, but the AI decided to use runway 33 and so PF3 changed runway to 33.
Then you asked for an ILS runway (hotkey 2) and PF3 calculated from scratch based on wind -> runway 15.
At this point I would have expected PF3 to announce the runway change, but it did not.
I have checked old logs if I have a log using this feature and only found this one:
05/12/2015 15:10:11: 380 - Transcript: 'Cessna Juliet 1608 maintain Heading 255 Cleared to final for Sierra Tango Approach runway 7 at pilot's discretion Contact Tower on 129.8 when established. '
05/12/2015 15:20:55: 800 - Transcript: 'Approach Cessna Juliet 1608 request an instrument approach '
05/12/2015 15:21:01: 080 - Transcript: 'Stand by. We'll check '
05/12/2015 15:21:16: 390 - Transcript: 'Cessna Juliet 1608 Continue present heading Cleared to final for Sierra Tango Approach runway 25 at pilot's discretion Contact Tower on 129.8 when established. ' |
So all I can say is, that it worked:
- with beta version 2.999.14
- when using a STAR
- when not having a runway change before that.
Dave, can you verify the triggers for the ATC runway call?
Rob, I should add that you do not need to request the ILS approach, this is only meant to switch from a non-ILS runway to an ILS runway for airports having both. You still found a bug, but the workaround is to not ask for something you already have
