I can't of course. But it would be a good thing to start with. And since mllgrennman said he wants to exclude the extreme cases only there is a high chance that we have the same voice sets in mind.
dmarch wrote: Wow! That's a bit risky! How do you know you have the same taste (or hearing).
Quote: It would be very kind if you would share your list of excluded voice sets here.

Nevertheless it would be nice if there would be the possibility to test the voice sets further than with that short phrase on the options#1 page. One or more longer phrases like an initial clearance or an approach clearance would be more representative. That would simplify not only to exclude a few voice sets but also to pick up the favorites to use as a pilot's / copilot's voice.
Totally agree!
mllgrennman wrote: BTW. there is a ton more that I love an PF3 than this one complaint, which is able to be resolved by the user..
And as said before, by far the most voices of PF3 are very good. Sometimes I tune to the corresponding feeds of LiveATC.net when flying with PF3, mixing real world and PF3 chatter. Often enough I'm not sure if that last transmission was PF3 or the real thing! In particular the PF3 noise effects proved to be totally authentic.
Btw (I already mentioned that some time ago): An option to assign a secondary sound device in PF3 would still be very much appreciated, to have PF3 on the headphones while the other sim sounds are on the speakers. Right now I use a freeware tool to achieve that but that seems to be some kind of buggy sometimes.
Thanks!
Regards
Ralf