OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

About Atc monitoring altitude and cap

PLEASE NOTE:

If you are reporting an issue with PF3 please remember to Zip and attach the Debug_Monitor.log file from your PF3\Logs folder. Thank you.

Post Reply   Page 2 of 2  [ 15 posts ]
Jump to page « 1 2
Author Message
drumsart
Post subject: Re: About Atc monitoring altitude and cap
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 1:52 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
dmarch wrote:
drumsart wrote:
Well, I sent all necessary stuf. No answer by now...
I did reply to you on 13-02-16 at 11:03 with the following:-

Thank you for your feedback. I will ensure your suggestion is added to our list of things to address in a forthcoming release :)
Hi Dave,

Thank you for your answer :) . In fact I never got your answer by mail. I looked, searched all over my computer. No trace !? :shock:

Now I will communicate on the forum.

Anyway thank you again.

Regards,

Richard Portier


Top
Profile Quote
drumsart
Post subject: Re: About Atc monitoring altitude and cap
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:05 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:07 pm
 
vololiberista wrote:
drumsart wrote:
Just added the Logs.zip (LFBO-LFBD)

Thanks,

Regards,

Richard Portier
Don't worry Dave 'will' get back to you.

As far as deviating from the fpl course check Options #1 - "Traffic advisories enroute" it works both ways as it were.
As far as deviating from the fpl course check set it to 4nm
Hi,

About the "Traffic advisories enroute"I'm not sure to understand the relationship with the problem I wrote in my first post.

Concerning your second remark I enter Airway deviation distance=1. Are you suggesting to leave it at 4nm ?

Thanks,

Regards,

Richard Portier


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: About Atc monitoring altitude and cap
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 2:50 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
drumsart wrote:
vololiberista wrote:
drumsart wrote:
Just added the Logs.zip (LFBO-LFBD)

Thanks,

Regards,

Richard Portier
Don't worry Dave 'will' get back to you.

As far as deviating from the fpl course check Options #1 - "Traffic advisories enroute" it works both ways as it were.
As far as deviating from the fpl course check set it to 4nm
Hi,

About the "Traffic advisories enroute"I'm not sure to understand the relationship with the problem I wrote in my first post.

Concerning your second remark I enter Airway deviation distance=1. Are you suggesting to leave it at 4nm ?

Thanks,

Regards,

Richard Portier
Hi Richard,
Yes the default is 4. If for example I'm taking-off from LIMF for the UK the SID has some very sharp right turns. If my speed is above 250kts then I go outside the turn radius and for anything less than 4 I will get nagged. When you think that 4nm represents only going off course for 30 seconds at cruise that's not much either :lol:

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Dave March
Post subject: Re: About Atc monitoring altitude and cap
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:30 pm
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 6095
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Sawtry, Cambridgeshire. UK
Contact: Website
 
vololiberista wrote:
Yes the default is 4. If for example I'm taking-off from LIMF for the UK the SID has some very sharp right turns. If my speed is above 250kts then I go outside the turn radius and for anything less than 4 I will get nagged. When you think that 4nm represents only going off course for 30 seconds at cruise that's not much either :lol:
But you should never be nagged before reaching your first waypoint :)

_________________

Cheers

Dave March

Email: dmarch@oncourse-software.co.uk

I don't know if my memory is getting worse as I get older...
...I just can't remember how it used to be!

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
vololiberista
Post subject: Re: About Atc monitoring altitude and cap
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:15 pm
Offline
 
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: LIMZ
 
dmarch wrote:
vololiberista wrote:
Yes the default is 4. If for example I'm taking-off from LIMF for the UK the SID has some very sharp right turns. If my speed is above 250kts then I go outside the turn radius and for anything less than 4 I will get nagged. When you think that 4nm represents only going off course for 30 seconds at cruise that's not much either :lol:
But you should never be nagged before reaching your first waypoint :)
No, not now with PF3. But it was a bit of a bind in PFE.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 2 of 2  [ 15 posts ]
Return to “PF3-ATC at its best” | Jump to page « 1 2
Jump to: