OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Search found 368 matches

[ Search found 368 matches ] Jump to page « 129 30 31 32 3337 »
Author Message
RALF9636
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 8:57 pm

 
Replies: 9
Views: 4944
 


Some minor issues on my flight KLAS-KSFO: 1. Shortly after the start of the descent the FSUIPC window told me there were no suitable runways and this should be reported on the support forum. Here you are! A cause for this might have been that I had disabled runways 10L, 10R, 01L and 01R for landings...
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: PF3 Randomizer
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:49 am

 
Replies: 52
Views: 160930
 


I'm really happy with this application. It's exactly what I wished to have. Thanks again Roman! And thank you Dave, for approving it for those who like it. Customization of probabilities and names As suggested by Richard and Ralf, I plan to provide a way to customize all probabilities and names. Thi...
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: PF3 Randomizer
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:54 am

 
Replies: 52
Views: 160930
 


I agree that the closeness to reality of the randomizer is highly dependent on where you fly. Like everything in context with STARs. So it's good to have these options.
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: PF3 Randomizer
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 10:32 am

 
Replies: 52
Views: 160930
 


You already put the SIDs and STARS you expect to use for the flight. So how can you randomise something that is not random! You either use SIDs or STARS or you don't use SIDs or STARs. That is dependent on the type of fpl anyway and the flight region. None of which is particularly random. Many simm...
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: PF3 Randomizer
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2016 7:01 am

 
Replies: 52
Views: 160930
 


Sounds great. Together with the just added holding percentage -thanks for that, Dave! - it seems we almost have what I suggested here: http://www.ocs-support.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1797 Roman, do you think you can also randomize the FAF distance for vectored approaches? And it would be...
RALF9636
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:31 pm

 
Replies: 5
Views: 3338
 


Great you already fixed it. Do I understand that correctly that - after the fix - PF3 always assigns vectors after a runway change even though the STAR option is activated? Receiving vectors after a runway change indeed makes a lot of sense if STARs are runway specific. But as far as I know for exam...
RALF9636
Post subject: Re: PF3 with MCE
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 7:23 am

 
Replies: 4
Views: 3302
 


Thank you for these tests, Rob. Would be interesting to know if the problems you had on approach were caused by MCE or PF3. Maybe that can be seen in your logs. MCE announced they are about to release an updated version of their Aerosoft Airbus Edition that should work with PF3 and the newest Airbus...
RALF9636
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:44 pm

 
Replies: 41
Views: 14593
 


Dan77 wrote:

Edit: Maybe we should split this topic off as it's drifted from the original post.
I opened a new thread "PF3 with MCE".
RALF9636
Post subject: PF3 with MCE
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:03 pm

 
Replies: 4
Views: 3302
 


Hi Ralf, Thank you Dave for letting me share my impressions of MCE :) After using PF3 for a few days I decided to turn to MCE for voice control, voice control was something I was used to with VoxATC. So after seeing MCE was updated I gave it a try, installation was simple and the only hitch I had w...
RALF9636
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 10:33 pm

 
Replies: 5
Views: 3338
 


Something went wrong on my last flight KSFO-KLAS. First I was cleared to approach Rwy 19R at pilot's descretion (STAR option ticked). Then I received a runway change to 1L and was told to expect vectors. Wind was variable in the METAR so the runway change itself seems plausible. But is it correct to...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 368 matches ] Jump to page « 129 30 31 32 3337 »
Jump to: