OnCourse Software

Welcome to our Product Support Forums

Search found 25 matches

[ Search found 25 matches ] Jump to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
mach2000
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:06 am

 
Replies: 51
Views: 15007
 


I guess the second "Good day" indicates the problem here: "hold your position" does not need a Roger/Readback (similar to "stand by"), and the extra Roger seems to have confused PF3. As Thomas pointed out - no taxi instructions were given, just the readback. If the &qu...
mach2000
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 2:41 am

 
Replies: 51
Views: 15007
 


Well at that precise moment I can assure you PF3 detected an AI aircraft using 33R. We don't actually look to see where an aircraft is or which way it is facing, we simply use the AI data table provided by FSUIPC and this shows the actual runway assigned to each aircraft. When PF3 first checked (wh...
mach2000
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:41 am

 
Replies: 51
Views: 15007
 


I had the same issue yesterday on a flight out of KIAH. The winds were out of the south (190/8 if I remember correctly), the ATIS advertised runway 15L in use and all the AI traffic appeared to be going to 15L; but when I called ground, I was told to taxi to runway 33R :shock: The zipped logs are at...
mach2000
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:29 am

 
Replies: 11
Views: 5716
 


Oh Really!!! That seems a contradictory. However the ICAO regulations are quite clear. You cannot request a visual approach if the runway is not in sight. You cannot make a request for a visual landing and then be vectored all over the territory. You can be vectored and "then" request a v...
mach2000
Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:29 pm

 
Replies: 11
Views: 5716
 


According to my real world advisor there are many reasons why you could not request a visual approach... one of which is you must have to have the airport in sight, you couldn't request a visual approach and then expect ATC to vector you into a position where you are aligned with the runway. It wou...
mach2000
Post subject: Re: PF3 Issues Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:17 pm

 
Replies: 7
Views: 4002
 


Hi MD... welcome to the forum... 1. That is a known problem for some users unfortunately... the following is from the user guide:- 23. known issues 23.1 Your Skin No we're not trying to be personal, we mean your choice of PF3 skin. 2. Please check your Trans Alt & Baro Calls selection which you...
mach2000
Post subject: Re: PF3 Issues Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:55 pm

 
Replies: 7
Views: 4002
 


No.3 Yes it sounds a bit terse. But when real ATC are busy that's often all you hear! An ocassional "Good Morning/Afternoon" would be nice too. Something of that nature is already on Dave's list for the future. It stems from stripping out the phrase "Radar Contact" as in ICAO it...
mach2000
Post subject: PF3 Issues Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:47 am

 
Replies: 7
Views: 4002
 


I've made several flights with PF3 and am generally very impressed... definitely a major step up from PFE. With that said, I've noticed several issues that appear to recur consistently. I consider most of these problems to be minor... but they're obvious bugs just the same: 1. After making changes i...
mach2000
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:32 am

 
Replies: 15
Views: 6839
 


Sorry, I meant the original thread regarding the hydraulic failure.
mach2000
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:48 pm

 
Replies: 17
Views: 7339
 


PF3 is the only one communicating via WideFS (other than a VAS LUA script). I also have ASN and Super Traffic Board running; but they're using simconnect. One clue is that each time the ATIS cycled (repeated) when RemoteText was off, it would sound a chime (like the fasten seat belts "ding"...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 25 matches ] Jump to page 1 2 3 »
Jump to: